A group of closely related packs of woodcut playing cards, among these a tarot pack, survive in the form of several fragments of uncut sheets of cards. All fragments are incomplete pieces of one or more imprints from ten different printing blocks. Taken together, the fragments of each group give an almost complete picture of the block they are printed from. Some blocks belong together, forming parts of the same pack.
The largest collection is located in Szépművészeti Múzeum (Museum of Fine Arts), Budapest. Duplicates from this collection are held by the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Smaller groups are found in the Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library at Yale University and previously in the collection of Theodore B. Donson, New York, in 2002 sold at an auction by Christie's. A single card found in Egypt is held by the Benaki Museum in Athens. Together these cover four of the packs; the fifth pack is represented by a group of fragments in Museo Fournier de Naipes (the Fournier Playing Card Museum), Vitoria-Gasteiz.
The cards are clearly of north Italian origin; Michael Dummett assigns them to Ferrara and dates them to the second half of the fifteenth century.
All blocks are of the same size – slightly smaller than a modern A3 sheet. Each consists four rows of cards, with six cards per row in the majority of the blocks. Three blocks are notably different in having only five slighly wider cards in each row. Two of these are the only ones to contain tarot trumps; together they contain all trumps and court cards of a standard tarot pack. Given the stylistic similarity and the very peculiar distribution of the trumps between them, it is obvious that they are part of the same pack.
The third of these blocks contains all cards from ace to ten in the suits of bastoni (batons) and spade (swords). Again, stylistical and pragmatical reasons indicate that it is part of the same pack as the previous two. A lost block with the same structure, only with the suits of coppe (cups) and denari (coins), would complete the set of four blocks of 20 cards each for a standard 78-card tarot pack (two positions are left blank in the first block).
In the diagrams, the background colour denote the proportion of the area of each card is preserved when the combination of all fragments are considered:
White – (almost) all
Yellow – three quarters
Peach – half
Pink – a quarter or less
Red – entirely missing
The titles of the extant blocks link to images of the preserved
fragments. Expansions of the abbreviated card identifiers are
The remaining blocks, all with 24 cards, fall in three subtypes. Type
1 have the twelve court cards – fante (knave), cavallo (knight) and re (king) in each
suit – in the lower half, while the upper half and the type 2 blocks
have the cards from ace to nine in each suit. While this covers the
normal structure for packs of the
Spanish and Portuguese
types of cards, Italian style cards of the period also contains
tens. This discrepancy is explained by the single instance of a type 3
block, consisting of six copies of each of the four tens.
One pair of type 1 and 2 two blocks obviously belong together because
of stylistic similarities and a distinctive division of the non-court
cards between the two blocks. The single surviving type 3 block matches
these (and only these) stylistically, resulting in the only completely
preserved pack in the collection. I have chosen the term
denote this pack, as it differs from the other packs in being somewhat
simpler both in design and execution of the pip cards.
One group of six fragments have been preserved independently of the main collection, and is now in the Fournier Playing Card Museum. Two fragments overlap, forming the top half of a type 1 block, another consists of an entire lower half of such a block, with a small tab extending into the upper half, and this matches the corresponding part of the upper half. The three remaining fragments do not overlap, but if it is assumed that they belong together, they form an exact type 2 complement to the type 1 sheet preseved alongside it. As they are also stylistically very compatible, there can be no doubt that they form parts of the same pack.
As mentioned above, the
Spanish and Portuguese types of
cards have the same structure as Italian ones, except that they
lack tens. As it is precisely the tens that were relegated to a separate
printing block in the
crude pack, one might speculate that some
packs were made for export, using only the type 1 and 2 blocks. Still,
as the designs are recognisably
Italian (though with a
significant variation in the suit of spade), I find it
probable that a now lost type 3 block once accompanied this preserved
The pip cards from two to nine in the suit of spade are identical to those in the tarot pack, apart from having the right and left edges trimmed somewhat in order to fit on the narrower cards, while those of bastoni are very similar.
Besides the pip cards mentioned above, the strongest link between the
Fournier pack and the main collection is a type 1 block from the latter
where all but one of the cards in the upper half are mirror-image copies
of the corresponding Fournier designs. While most of its court cards are
unique, two of the knight cards are mirror-image copies of those in the
crude pack, and a third is a non-reversed copy. Such reversals
are common in historical card production, as the easiest way to copy a
pack was to trace an existing set of cards directly onto the face of a
woodblock, which of course gives a reversed image when used for
printing. The peculiar thing about this instance is that the text
denoting the value of the pip cards in the suit of bastoni is also reversed. For this reason I have chosen to
call this the
The lost type 2 and 3 blocks would presumably be mirror images of the corresponding blocks of the Fournier pack. However, as the asso di denari (ace of coins) is different, it is possible that also the other cards of this suit also had another design.
The relationship between the final block and all the others presents something of a conundrum.
On one hand, these cards are stylistically less closely related to
the other packs, and shares no identical designs with any of them. It
has more detailed pip cards in the suit of coppe than
the Fournier pack, which in this regard is substantially better than the
crude pack (the only other packs to preserve these cards). The
court cards are more refined, using hatched shading (this is also used
in the Fournier pack) and more detailed foregrounds in the court cards.
I have therefore chosen to call this the
On the other hand, it has the same block and card sizes, identical
borders around the cards and around the outer edge. The selection of
cards and their general placement within the block is identical to block
1 of the Fournier and
reversed packs, except having the pip cards
from two to nine of coppe instead of bastoni. It is not only preserved in the same collection
as the majority of the other sheets, but the chararteristic shapes of
the fragments, including small rectangular holes along one of the short
edges, indicates that it went through the same kind of reuse after being
scrapped. Thus these fragments are not merely placed among the others at
a later date by a collector.
Absent any other explanation of the latter points, my tentative conclusion is that despite the stylistic differences, this pack was most likely made in the same workshop and at the same time as the others.
On this background, it is of great interest to observe that the
elegant pack’s asso di spade (ace of swords)
fits much better with the pip cards of this suit in the tarot and the
Fournier packs than the ones actually present in those packs.